Showing posts with label Evan Zhao. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Evan Zhao. Show all posts

Possible New Legislation on the Export of E-waste


by Evan Zhao


     Electronic waste, or e-waste, is a term used to describe electronics at the end of their useful lives. E-waste can be generated from a variety of sources, ranging from cell phones and computers to media tablets and portable music devices. As global demand for these electronic technologies increases, the management of e-waste becomes increasingly important.

     On one hand, the inefficient recycling of e-waste has contributed to the rising price of valuable metals such as gold. Currently, the worldwide manufacturing of electric and electronic devices requires an annual $21 billion in gold and silver, but less than 15% of these metals are recovered from e-waste. This inefficiency is partly due to the export of e-waste from developed to developing countries for processing. Although exporting e-waste overseas reduces processing costs, these reductions occur at the expense of efficiency. The crude dismantling processes of many developing nations result in 50% of the gold in e-waste being lost and a recovery rate of only 25% for the remaining gold, whereas modern facilities in developed countries are able to recover 95% of the 75% of gold not lost in the dismantling process.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Intellectual Property Rights


by Evan Zhao


     The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) aims to integrate economies across the Asia-Pacific region and serve as a template for future regional trade agreements. The TPP has expanded from its four original signatories (Brunei, Chile, Singapore, and New Zealand) to include the United States, Australia, Peru, Vietnam, and Malaysia, and, as of June 2012, Mexico and Canada. The most recent round of negotiations (Round 14) took place September 6-15, 2012, in Leesburg, Virginia.

     Although TPP negotiations have been active for some time, they are shrouded in secrecy. TPP parties have no obligation to release their positions to the public. U.S. officials have indicated, however, that a congressional review and public comment period will follow the completion of talks. In the meantime, a leaked draft of the U.S. position has unveiled aggressive intellectual property (IP) provisions that implement IP measures far more restrictive than what international law currently requires.