Showing posts with label ISIS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ISIS. Show all posts
By Thea McDonald

Picture: Globe License: Public Domain


North Korea Tests Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles Potentially Capable of Reaching Any Location in Continental U.S.

Tensions between North Korea and the United States rose over the last year as the nations’ leaders exchanged threats and snarky comments. As American lawmakers considered options for managing the escalating threat and warned that initiating nuclear action against this rival could lead to grave consequences, North Korea built and tested its arsenal. During 2017, North Korea conducted 16 tests that included a total of 23 missiles. The 23rd missile, a Hwasong-15 tested near the end of November, reached an altitude of 2,800 miles, the highest altitude any North Korean missile has ever reached. According to CNN, KCNA, North Korea’s state-run news outlet reported that this missile is capable of reaching any location on the U.S. mainland and “meets the goal of the completion of the rocket weaponry system development.” This “successful” test spurred the United Nations Security Council to approve sanctions against the aggressor that limit the amount of refined oil North Korea can import and scrutinize shipping into and out of the country.


ISIS Defeated in Syria and Iraq

ISIS has terrorized parts of the world for years. Finally, in 2017, an international coalition took control of two key ISIS strongholds, Raqqa in Syria and Mosul in Iraq. According to U.S. News & World Report, 35,000 ISIS fighters held more than 17,000 square miles in the two states in January of 2017; by December, an estimated 1,000-3,000 fighters occupied a mere 2,000 square miles. This success came after months of fighting in both cities – fighting that killed as many as 11,000 civilians in Mosul alone. While much of the world celebrates the successes against the terrorist group, intelligence officers worldwide remain concerned about future potential ISIS-inspired “lone-wolf” attacks similar to those that have previously occurred in the U.S. and Europe.

Ethnic Cleansing in Myanmar

The Rohingya Crisis worsened this year as more than 6,700 Rohingya were killed, and as many as 2,300 died of starvation and other nonviolent causes, between August and September at the hands of the Myanmar government. This ethnic group has faced severe violence and brutality from their predominantly Buddhist government and its military, which have attempted to disguise the atrocities against the Rohingya as responding to internal terrorist attacks. In fact, the Myanmar government invoked sovereignty, which the New York Times describes as “the single biggest loophole in international laws and norms against atrocities,” as its defense against other world governments organizing action. As government leaders across the world, including U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, called for the Myanmar government and military to halt the atrocities the have led more than 600,000 Rohingya to flee Myanmar for Bangladesh, sovereignty has “prevailed” for the Myanmar government by allowing Myanmar to “act within their borders and protect [its] interests.”

By Nicholas Nalbantian



Photo: Wikimedia Commons/Julian Nitzsche, Creative Commons License

On September 27, 2016, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., Gary Vikan presented his memoir: Sacred and Stolen. After twenty-seven years at the Walters Art Museum in Baltimore, including eighteen years as its director, we were given an inside view of the art world and the development of the international law of art theft.

Dr. Vikan began by recounting an earlier time, in the 1970s and 1980s, when the comfort level for purchasing stolen art was still high. Collectors were more concerned with whether any particular piece had been called “stolen” publicly rather than concerned for the reality surrounding the item. Such little care made the West a ready market for plundered works of artistic and historical significance. From 1975 to 1984, Dr. Vikan worked at the Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, an American center for Byzantine art. During that time, Dr. Vikan witnessed the flood of plundered artifacts following the Turkish invasion of Cyprus, a part of the more general effort to “de-Hellenize” Northern Cyprus.

Dr. Vikan’s talk focused on two particular episodes: In the first, he recounted the entertaining tale of how Vikan helped Dominique De Menile, the oil heiress, obtain thirteenth century frescos in 1983. Through her generosity, these plundered mosaics were housed in Houston, with permission from Cyprus, until 2012 when they were returned. However, the second episode more significantly highlights the contribution Dr. Vikan made to the jurisprudence of international art theft. This is the saga of the sixth century Kanakaria Mosaics.

The Kanakaria Mosaics were likely stolen from the Cypriot Church of the Panagia Kanakaria in 1979. In 1988, the mosaics were sold for $1.2 million in cash from a dubious German art dealer in Geneva to Peg Goldberg, an Indianapolis dealer in nineteenth and twentieth century paintings. Upon returning to the United States, Goldberg tried to sell the mosaics to the J. Paul Getty Museum in California for $20 million; such a high profile item sale alerted Cypriot authorities to the mosaic’s location.

Once located, the Autocephalous Greek Orthodox Church brought suit in federal district court in Indianapolis in 1989 for the return of the mosaics. In an illustration of how the law treats the issue of plundered art like any other stolen item, the action of replevin had to begin with the court considering whether Indiana applied the O’Keeffe v. Snyder rule on the statute of limitations. The court determined that the O’Keeffe v. Snyder rule did apply, which meant that the statute of limitations began upon discovery of the mosaics by the Orthodox Church, rather than running from their date of theft. Dr. Vikan was called as an expert witness to explain whether these mosaics were sufficiently suspicious to defeat Goldberg’s defense that she was a good faith purchaser. Judge Nolan was unconvinced by Goldberg and ruled in favor of the Orthodox Church. Goldberg appealed, but the Seventh Circuit affirmed:

“Lest this result seem too harsh, we should note that those who wish to purchase art work on the international market...are not without means by which to protect themselves. Especially when circumstances are as suspicious as those that faced Peg Goldberg, prospective purchasers would do best to do more than make a few last-minute phone calls. As testified to at trial, in a transaction like this, ‘All the red flags are up, all the red lights are on, all the sirens are blaring.’”

With the Seventh Circuit quoting the testimony of Dr. Vikan – "All the red flags are up, all the red lights are on, all the sirens are blaring." –  he has made a noted contribution to the growing customary international law on art theft as the choices made by the United States may influence other states’ courts in the future. The international law of art theft has seen improvement since the 1970s, but is still lacking in many regards.

Dr. Vikan’s experiences with the occupation of northern Cyprus can inform how to deal with the current trade of plundered artifacts from Syria and Iraq.  Art theft is the third highest-netting criminal enterprise after drugs and guns, and a number of valuable pieces remain on the market as a result. The governmental instinct is that of restriction, such as Cyprus’ foreign minister  Ioannis Kasoulides’ request that the UN Security Council “apply universal limitations on the trade and transfer of artefacts originating from all conflict zone, with the obligation of proof of legitimate trade resting on the traders, auction houses and buyers and not on the originating state.” The hope is that cutting off market access will remove a stream of income available to ISIS. Combating terrorism is important, but we should perhaps take a more nuanced approach than the one espoused by Kasoulides.

ISIS has been destroying antiquities like the Temple of Baalshamin or the contents of the Mosul Museum. Their movement is iconoclastic and they wish to remove evidence of pre-Islamic civilization. Yet, should we follow Kasoulides’ lead, we risk the further destruction of Syrian and Iraqi history. Dr. Vikan shared his belief that there is value in providing safe harbor to these items of national and cultural significance, a notion that it is better that the sixth century mosaics eventually return to Nicosia than risk their permanent destruction at the hands of nationalists or iconoclasts. So too recovered relics should be protected by states without conflict zones rather than rejecting them out of hand. The U.S. government passed the Protect and Preserve International Cultural Property Act in September 2016, which, in part, adopted this tendency. The Act includes provisions that allow for the waiver of import restrictions if “the President determines that, for purposes of protecting and preserving such material, the material should be temporarily located in the United States.” This is the goal epitomized by Dominique De Menile. The law should allow for these cultural relics to be protected in the stable states, without taking title to the item, in the hope that these antiquities will someday be returned to their home region.

As for items that are already in the United States illegitimately, there needs to be a process of recovery superior to the one the Cypriote government went through with the Goldbergs. There are laws in place aimed at preventing the theft of the historical objects, including the 1970 UNESCO Convention requiring the repatriation of objects illegally removed from many countries. However, the process is still cumbersome and can take four to five years for an identified piece to be returned to Egypt. The Protect and Preserve International Cultural Property Act was a step in the right direction, but more needs to be done to aid the recovered pieces to be returned to their rightful homes.

The book “Sacred and Stolen: Confessions of a Museum Director” by Dr. Gary Vikan was published September 20, 2016.


By William Stroupe

France has proposed that the European Union impose sanctions on Libya to nudge the country’s fractious political factions towards the creation of a unity government. Though the country has an internationally recognized parliament, two separate parliaments have competed for primacy since 2014 when an Islamist militia ousted the internationally recognized government from Tripoli. Previous UN efforts to merge the governments have failed. Sanctions would target leaders of both groups in an attempt to force them to the negotiating table. The unstable situation in Libya has become increasingly urgent as ISIS gains an increasingly strong foothold thanks to the political vacuum. France and other EU countries have expressed concerns that expelling ISIS, or even limiting its growth in Libya, will be impossible without a unity government. The creation of a unity government is a precondition to any military intervention or aid against ISIS from the EU. Tentative talks on UN sanctions quickly broke down in the Security Council.
By Olga Symeonoglou

A U.S. official has anonymously confirmed the presence of sulfur mustard on weaponry used in attacks in Syria and Iraq. It is not clear whether the Islamic State is manufacturing the chemical weapon or using caches of it found in either Iraq or Syria. It seems unlikely that the U.S. would have overlooked any chemical weapons in Iraq, and Syria gave up its chemical weapons pursuant to a 2013 UN Security Council Agreement. Some have also suggested the Syrian regime or the rebels could be responsible for using sulfur mustard, which is banned under the Chemical Weapons Convention.
By Huiyu Yin

Thousands of Arabs in “security zones” in areas of northern Iraq have been confined by Iraqi Kurdish forces since August 2014, when they were captured from ISIS. Local Kurds told Human Rights Watch that dozens of Arab homes had been destroyed in the area. Moreover, Kurdish forces for months barred these Arabs from returning to their homes in Ninewa and Erbil provinces, while permitting Kurds to return to those areas.

Human Rights Watch raises its concerns about ethnic discrimination under the guise of counter terrorism with KRG authorities in communities in Sheikhan and Tilkaif districts and Zumar subdistrict, all in Ninewa province, and Makhmur district in Erbil province.
By Rick Mendenhall

This week the Obama administration upped the ante in the battle against ISIS, but on the Turkish-Syria border a different type of struggle against ISIS is taking place: one for Syria’s ancient artifacts. 

A group of modern day Indiana Joneses have gathered—academics (possibly fedora-adorned)—tasking themselves with protecting relics and archeological sites from looters, civilians, and ISIS.
Their quest, moreover, is not just an idle adventure of cognescentes—the illegal trade in Syria’s cultural goods is ISIS’s second highest revenue source (after oil).

That said, these scholars are not working outside the framework of international law. A rich tradition of art protection has evolved since World War II. This Wednesday February 18, the American Society of International law is hosting a symposium on that very topic—international royalty rights, looting prevention, and repatriation procedures. Please join them for a stimulating discussion.
By Ena Cefo

On October 14, 2014 the Department of Defense (DoD) released a report warning about the effect of climate change on global political instability, poverty, hunger and conflict through the lens of the U.S. armed forces and their military tasks. The report gives the U.S. military a better understanding of how climate change will impact its bases, military missions, relief efforts, training, and infrastructure. Increasing global temperatures, changing and extreme weather patterns, and rising sea levels are set to cause future food shortages, infectious diseases, and mass migrations. These catastrophic results will be the leading factors in an immediate threat to national security and global political unrest.
By Jieying Ding

Although the Obama administration has domestic legal justifications for its use of airstrikes in Syria, an international legal justification may be hard to find. According to The Daily Beast, both the Syrians and their Russian allies have objected to U.S. airstrike under international law. A senior fellow at the Center for American Progress expressed his disappointment at lack of support in international law because it’s important for U.S. to be seen as adhering to international legal principles, especially after it accused Russia of violating international law. Individual self-defense and collective self-defense are the two potential international legal justifications, but both have wide controversies.
By Huiyu Yin

Nabeel Rajab, a prominent human rights activist, had just returned to Bahrain on September 30 from Europe, where he had made public appearances criticizing his government for using counterterrorism laws to prosecute human rights defenders and charged that Bahraini security forces foster violent beliefs akin to those of the Islamic State (IS, otherwise known as ISIS or ISIL). On October 1, 2014, Rajab was arrested and faced with charges that he “offended national institutions” in comments on social media on September 28.”

According to Human Rights Watch, this is clearly a violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Bahrain has ratified. The UN Human Rights Committee issued General Comment 34 to interpret the scope of the right to freedom of expression and opinion. The committee stated that “In circumstances of public debate concerning public figures in the political domain and public institutions, the value placed by the Covenant upon uninhibited expression is particularly high.” It also stated that “states parties should not prohibit criticism of institutions, such as the army or the administration.”