Showing posts with label children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label children. Show all posts
By Britanny Vanderhoof

Since the conflict in Syria began, over four million people have fled and are living as refugees in host countries. Humanitarian aid has been inconsistent and cuts to assistance programs have had devastating impacts on refugees. Refugees, although living safely in host countries, may face poverty, little or no access to medical care, and few educational opportunities. The situation is causing people to lose hope and forcing families to make the impossible decision of remaining in their current situation, risking return to Syria, or attempting to make the perilous journey to Europe. 

No one solution will address all of the challenges faced by Syrian refugees. However, allowing Syrians to work is one step that could help alleviate the stresses on families described above. Allowing refugees to work would reduce their reliance on aid and increase their ability to pay for services such as medical care. Despite the necessity and importance of allowing refugees to work, Jordan has instituted policies that prevent Syrian refugees from seeking legal employment. While Jordan is not the only host country to impose this restriction (Lebanon and Turkey have also instituted barriers to employment), this article will focus on the situation in Jordan as an example of problems facing the region.  
By Elizabeth Gibson*

The U.S. State Department has just rolled out a new policy that should help reduce a rare form of statelessness caused by a conflict of laws related to Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART).

Technologies designed to help infertile couples have children have greatly improved over the past few decades. The use of egg and sperm donors as well as gestational surrogates has become increasingly common, and last month nine Swedish women made headlines for receiving womb transplants.

However, the law has often struggled to keep pace with the evolving definition of what it means to be a mother or father, especially as couples travel across borders in search of cheaper or newer procedures. In some cases, couples have used Assisted Reproductive Technology overseas only to later be told that they cannot take their newborn home because conflicting laws say the child is not their own or does not qualify for citizenship in their home country.