Showing posts with label investment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label investment. Show all posts
By Brian Kesten

Starwood Hotels & Resorts, an American company, has agreed to buy and renovate three historic resorts in Cuba. The purchase, approved by the Treasury Department in the U.S., marks the first major foray of an American company into Cuba in decades. Although Congress has not acted to end the embargo on Cuba, President Obama continues to lift restrictions on travel, financial transactions, and trade with Cuba.

The major Caribbean island observed a 25 percent increase in visitors in 2015. However, Cuba may not have the capacity to welcome additional visitors: Cuba’s resort industry has been oversaturated, causing shortages and overbookings.
By April Kent

At the beginning of October, Iranian Oil Minister Rokneddin Javadi invited foreign investors to help develop its oil fields and improve pipeline and refinery infrastructure in the country. This past Friday, Reuters has reported that the U.S. State Department recently cabled a “demarche” to embassies around the world to reiterate that sanctions on Iran are still in place and will not be lifted until the International Atomic Energy Agency verifies compliance with the terms of the Iran Nuclear Deal. The U.S. wants to prevent a rush by Western companies to invest in Iran’s oil industry and other businesses. European oil executives from Royal Dutch Shell and Eni have already been sending small teams to Iran to meet with Iran’s oil minister about potential opportunities. American companies, on the other hand, face tighter restrictions: the Iran Nuclear Deal does not include easing many of the sanctions that have prevented U.S. companies themselves from doing business in Iran.
By Evan Abrams

Human rights groups are urging Myanmar to reconsider several provisions in its much touted draft investment law. The law is a key step in the country’s recent move toward more open markets and democratic accountability. According to Voice of America groups have expressed concern that the law would make it difficult for the government to pass subsequent regulations to protect human rights and the environment. Human Rights Watch has been particularly critical, claiming that the law was put forth with very little public consultation.
By Evan Abrams

The Egyptian Investment Ministry is working a new law designed to streamline the investment process and create a one-stop shop for obtaining licenses and permits. Daily News Egypt reports that the law will be submitted for review to 60 international and domestic organizations, including the International Finance Corporation. The law is still subject to continuing negotiations within the Egyptian government, particularly regarding the appropriate level of investment incentives to provide. The law has received a positive reception from investor groups who have long been concerned about Egypt’s burdensome business laws.
By Jenny Park

The world’s biggest banks met with British regulators to discuss the possibility of settling the investigation into alleged manipulation of the foreign currency market. The banks’ traders are suspected of manipulating the foreign exchange rates that served as benchmarks for investments, of colluding to fix prices, and of front-running customers. With a potential fine of up to $3.3 billion, this investigation is one of many, which includes criminal investigations by U.S. and Britain. These investigations resemble an earlier crackdown on banks, which rigged the benchmark for credit card rates and other loans, which resulted in billions of dollars in penalties.

Read more here.
By Craig Tarasoff

Hong Kong’s securities regulator, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), has initiated legal proceedings against Citic Ltd., a Chinese state-owned investment company, and several of its former directors, to compensate investors for massive losses in 2008. Citic invested heavily in the Australian dollar, which subsequently decreased significantly in value resulting in losses of over $2 billion. There are reports that the directors knew of the losses for multiple weeks before disclosing information to investors. The SFC appears to have brought legal proceeding for these events from six years ago,  because if it had waited any longer prosecution would have been barred by Hong Kong’s statute of limitations. The Wall Street Journal has the details.
By Katie Bacharach

BITs, perhaps the most common economic treaties in modern times, have only recently begun to encompass protections for stakeholders, and there has been some controversy as to whether the protections that have been included are effective. On April 9, the Georgetown Global Law Scholars and Lawyers for Corporate Accountability will be hosting a conference where a panel of speakers will present their thoughts on the challenge of protecting labor and environmental rights through the BIT mechanism and discuss what form of protection offers the best chance of being realistically effective.

The speakers will include: Ben Beach, Research Director, Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch; Lee M. Caplan, Partner, International Arbitration and Dispute Resolution, Arent Fox; Gary Horlick, International Trade Lawyer and Adjunct Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center; Karin Kizer, Attorney Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser’s Office of Economics and Business, U.S. Department of State.

The conference will be held at Georgetown University Law Center on Wednesday, April 9, 2014 from 2:30-4:30 p.m. in McDonough Hall 205. Drinks and hors d’oeuvres will be served at a post-conference reception from 4:30-5:30 p.m.


For more information, please contact Adina Appelbaum at appelbaum.adina@gmail.com.

By Sam Obenhaus
NATO-Ukraine Commission session in Brussels |
U.S. Department of State on Flickr 


Money flows quickly.  It has no morals and tends to have a very short memory.  In the case of great powers, it’s tentacles also bind economies together in ways that are hard to define and even harder to untangle.

This last trait has, of course, been a tremendous benefit of expanding trade and interdependence since the latter half of the 20th century.  Global trade, some like to say, is now “too big to fail.”  The interconnectedness it created pacified Europe, the most violent continent for the majority of recent history, and this is not about to change.  World War III, or even another Cold War, is not around the corner.

But has the deterrence of large-scale conflict come at the expense of reducing the expected costs associated with moderate acts of aggression?  This is the hypothesis Russian President Vladimir Put is testing in Crimea and maybe soon in Eastern Ukraine.
By Sam Obenhaus

The United Kingdom wants banking regulations covered by the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), a free trade agreement being negotiated by the United States and European Union.  The United States, however, is opposed to including the matter.  

According to Lord Ian Livingston of Parkhead, the U.K. Minister for Trade and Investment, U.S. negotiators have expressed fear that any agreement on banking regulations will have the effect of unwinding key parts of Dodd-Frank, the important but controversial financial reform bill passed in the wake of the Great Recession.  

“If you go back to Glass Steagal, America has felt that things were unwound over time and that that's problematical. They don't want the same thing to happen with Dodd Frank,” he said, while speaking before the E.U. Sub-Committee on External Affairs. 

According to the E.U. Trade Commissioner, the two sides aim to complete negotiations on the entire agreement by November. Bloomberg BNA has more on this issue and the ongoing negotiation of TTIP.
By Joe Vladeck 

Russia's economy is stagnating, and domestic turbulence is not helping. 

The CEO of Uralkali, the world's largest potash company, is under house arrest in Belarus, even as the company is up for sale. Stocks in Tinkoff Credit Systems, a charge card company, modeled after Capital One, fell by 40 percent in a single day on rumors that its business model would be outlawed by the Russian parliament. And the Russian central bank just shut down a large retail bank, Master Bank, which counts among its board members a follower of Nicholas Roerich, a mystical guru and painter influential in early 20th-century Russia. 

These and other revelations are hurting Russian companies seeking to raise much-needed equity. Trading volumes are decreasing as foreign investors look elsewhere, increasing the volatility -- and the risk -- in a cycle that looks hard to break. Euromoney has the report.
By Sam Obenhaus

As recently as this summer, top U.S. officials were telling their European counterparts that financial sector regulations would not be included in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (T-TIP) negotiations.  Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew and other Administration officials were eager to discuss market access issues, potentially making it easier for financial institutions to operate in both jurisdictions, but thought that financial regulatory reform should be addressed in another forum, such as the G20.  A major concern, presumably one the Administration still harbors, is that negotiations with Europe will only weaken the U.S.’s comparatively more rigorous financial regulatory system.

Nonetheless, Dan Mullaney, the U.S.’s chief negotiator, recently signaled an about-face with the U.S. now prepared to hold discussions on financial regulatory issues at a special November 27 meeting with his European counterparts.  One explanation for the shift is that the U.S. now believes that it can pull Europe closer to its position and force a compromise on its own terms.  Another explanation is the Administration is coming around to the idea that the benefits of regulatory convergence will outweigh the costs of compromise.

The Wall Street Journal has more information on Treasury Secretary Lew’s prior reluctance to include financial market regulations in the T-TIP talks while Bloomberg BNA has more on U.S. negotiators’ recent reversal.
By Aliza Kempner

Mexico’s export industry is learning to stay current. With competition growing from other low-cost locations and the lower house of Mexico’s congress approving President Enrique Peña Nieto’s proposal to eliminate a range of deductions and allowances benefiting factories, the companies that use these factories are trying to get involved in design and development.  

Successfully staying in the game could allow the Mexican companies to hold onto American investment in their products as the United States looks closer to home in response to rising costs in China. The Economists examines the context surrounding these departures from the tax policies of the past fifty years.
By Joe Vladeck 

Investors are either excited or skeptical about Chinese tech companies. It depends who you ask, and when you pose the question. 

On November 1st, the New York Times' Dealbook reported that the return of Chinese companies to U.S. stock markets was "still in its early days" and posited that "the question now … is whether [several] recent debuts are an anomaly or have truly managed to unfreeze a market that was once a top destination for Chinese companies seeking to list overseas." Dealbook went on to explain that in 2010, "short-sellers and regulators started exposing what grew into a flurry of accounting scandals at Chinese companies with overseas listings," and concluded that "it is too early to say whether Chinese stocks are back in favor."

Just five days later, Dealbook answered its own question. In an article written under the headline "U.S. Investors Brush Aside Fears About Chinese Internet Companies," Dealbook reported that, "[f]or American investors, love of technology has conquered a fear of China." The latter article went on to explain that Americans buyers "are snapping up shares of Chinese Internet companies going public" in the Unites States, in "striking contrast with the recent past, when accounting scams and poor governance prompted many to shun Chinese stocks."

All the while, a new scandal was brewing: the stock of NQ Mobile, a Chinese telecom company, was in free-fall, owing to allegations of accounting fraud. NQ Mobile's U.S.-listed shares fell 62 percent, and Piper Jaffray, the lead manager of NQ Mobile's IPO, suspended the Chinese firm's favorable rating. Erik Lam, the director of Asian equity at global brokerage Auerbach Grayson & Co., summed up the market's sentiment: "That certainly doesn't sound positive."
By Phillip Yu

After four years of negotiations, Canada and the European Union have produced the framework of a comprehensive trade agreement, hoping to create significant trade and investment liberalization between the two parties. One exciting feature of this agreement is the encouragement of increased labor mobility rights, which would allow entry of certain Canadian businesses, service providers, and employees into the European Union without the need for visas or work permits. One of the more controversial issues addressed is the European Union's demand for greater patent protection for its pharmaceutical industry to cover time lost during the lengthy patent prosecution process.

At this point, it is estimated that resolving technical and substantive details, finalizing the treaty’s text, translating the treaty, and final ratification will take at least two more years.
Factory | By Peter Grifin
By Katie Bacharach

A Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) is a treaty between two states that ensures that investors of one state receive certain agreed upon standards of treatment when investing in the other state. The primary purpose is to encourage foreign direct investment (FDI) between the two states, which in turn should lead to economic growth for both states.

The emphasis on protecting the investor has had two important implications for BITs. First, broader public policy concerns have not traditionally made their way into these agreements. Second, the agreements have typically been characterized by an asymmetry of power, where foreign investors are accorded a number of substantive rights under the agreement without being subject to any specific obligations. For those concerned with labor rights and corporate social responsibility, this can be a dangerous combination that can lead to a “race to the bottom,” where countries continue to relax labor standards in order to attract investors.

One potential way to get around this race to the bottom and to impose labor rights obligations on multinational and transnational corporations is to insert labor commitments directly into BITs. In recent years there has been a push for governments to do a better job of incorporating broader public policy concerns, including labor rights, into their BITs. Consequently, a number of countries have inserted labor safeguards into the language of their model BITs (which are essentially templates that countries formulate as their treaty ideal and then use as a starting point for negotiating actual agreements).