Showing posts with label labor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label labor. Show all posts
By Katie Bacharach

A new briefing by Sedex Global and Verite has found that it is possible to remove modern-day slavery from global supply chains, but only if global companies contribute to greater transparency and collaboration, according to the IPS News Agency

The briefing outlines modern-day slavery statistics and highlights issues such as “broker-induced hiring traps” that had not been addressed sufficiently before. The briefing also emphasizes the risks businesses face with regard to modern-day slavery and provides recommendations for brands and suppliers to engage in ethical practices in supply chains.
By Phillip Yu

If you’ve ever been to one of the more populous cities in China or have seen recent photographs, you’ll know that China has a pollution problem, with a sky of grey during the day and everyday citizens donning masks. While industrial coal complexes are certainly large contributors to the pollution, some experts blame trade agreements established in the 1990s by President Bill Clinton that harnessed the West’s demand for consumer products while taking advantage of cheap labor and lax environmental standards.

Not only are the Chinese suffering from ailments like lung cancer just simply breathing, the United States is getting hit with lost jobs and a downward pressure on wages. While changing the way China generates electricity will be difficult, experts hope that China will take initiative to capture and sequester carbon emissions.  
By Julie Inglese

In the years leading up to the 2014 Winter Olympics, thousands of migrant workers from countries such as Armenia, Bosnia, Kyrgyzstan, Serbia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and the Ukraine arrived to Sochi, Russia to build an Olympic-worthy city from the ground up. Though most of these workers came to Russia willingly, they quickly faced inhumane treatment by their host country. Specifically, migrant workers in Russia were denied the proper housing promised by their employers and payment for their labor. This raises the question: Has the International Olympic Committee (IOC) violated the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) by allowing the Olympic Games to proceed in spite of the human rights violations suffered by migrant workers?

The UNGP’s are guidelines adopted based on the Special Representative’s “Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework,” which was unanimously adopted by the Human Rights Council. They are intended to provide practical advice to governments, companies, and other stakeholders on how to better protect individuals and communities from the adverse human rights impacts of business activities.

The Olympic Committee’s decision to allow Russia to host the 2014 Olympic Games is questionable from the standpoint of international human rights guidelines, but is not itself a violation of international norms.

However, by virtue of their business relationship, the Olympic Committee assumes responsibility for any human rights violations Russia commits in connection with the Olympic Games. The Committee has a business relationship with Russia as the host country for the 2014 Olympic Games, and the Committee is a business enterprise within the meaning of the UNGP. Under the UNGP, a business enterprise like the Olympic Committee must “avoid infringing on the human rights of others.”
 "Studies among the Snow Crystals"
by Wilson Bentley (NOAA)
Dear Readers,

The Summit will be on hiatus for much of December as our writers tackle their exams and take a well-deserved break. We will still be posting periodic articles, but updates will be a little less regular.

If you need some international law to tide you over through the holidays, check out this comparative law report on how states regulate paid holidays. Spoiler Alert: The United States ranks dead last.

Thank you all for your ongoing support and see you in the New Year!

Regards,
Elizabeth Gibson
Senior Online Content Editor

Factory | By Peter Grifin
By Katie Bacharach

A Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) is a treaty between two states that ensures that investors of one state receive certain agreed upon standards of treatment when investing in the other state. The primary purpose is to encourage foreign direct investment (FDI) between the two states, which in turn should lead to economic growth for both states.

The emphasis on protecting the investor has had two important implications for BITs. First, broader public policy concerns have not traditionally made their way into these agreements. Second, the agreements have typically been characterized by an asymmetry of power, where foreign investors are accorded a number of substantive rights under the agreement without being subject to any specific obligations. For those concerned with labor rights and corporate social responsibility, this can be a dangerous combination that can lead to a “race to the bottom,” where countries continue to relax labor standards in order to attract investors.

One potential way to get around this race to the bottom and to impose labor rights obligations on multinational and transnational corporations is to insert labor commitments directly into BITs. In recent years there has been a push for governments to do a better job of incorporating broader public policy concerns, including labor rights, into their BITs. Consequently, a number of countries have inserted labor safeguards into the language of their model BITs (which are essentially templates that countries formulate as their treaty ideal and then use as a starting point for negotiating actual agreements).
Former Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour.
By Elizabeth Gibson

It’s not a revolutionary concept, but the United States needs to start thinking about how immigration can benefit the country, and former Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour says that means thinking of immigration in terms of economics.

“We are in a global battle for capital and labor,” he told a crowd of immigration policy makers and legal practitioners today.  “We need good immigration reform. What we’ve got now is terrible. It doesn’t work for anybody.”

The former Republican governor of Mississippi was speaking at the 10thAnnual Immigration Law and Policy Conference at the Georgetown University Law Center. The event, co-sponsored by Georgetown and the Migration Policy Institute, is being webcast, including an address at 2:45 this afternoon by Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona.  

During Barbour’s address, he said Americans need to stop worrying that immigrants are stealing jobs. He told a story about a chicken processing factory in Mississippi that is almost entirely staffed by Hispanic workers. The government tried to use the factory as a site for a program that puts inmates at work in the community and lets them keep their earnings. The program is usually very popular with inmates, but they never lasted more than a week in the chicken factory before deciding they would literally rather be in prison because the work was so difficult. Barbour said the moral of the story is that immigrants are doing the work that Americans need done but don’t want to do.

As the populations of Western countries age, there is increasingly a need to import labor, and how well the United States competes for that labor will shape the future of the U.S. economy, Barbour said.

Although he was not speaking on behalf of the Bipartisan Policy Center, Barbour co-chairs the think-tank’s immigration task force and said the task force’s new report has the economic statistics to back him up. The Migration Policy Institute's research on immigration and labor also is worth a look.

But what do you think?