By Nathaniel DeLucia
One of the most important discussions in international and United
States law is currently underway, although most Americans probably have no idea,
that of patent law reform. Yes I know,
patent law is not nearly as sexy as “counter-terrorism” or “Ebola” (though this
does involve patent law as I will explain later). However, the recent trend to reform and unify
the world’s patent laws has the potential to have a tremendous impact on
international trade.
Last month, the world’s top IP leaders (the U.S., Japan,
Korea, China, and the EU) announced
efforts to reduce differences in patent laws.
Before we dive into current events, it’s important to get
some background information. To start, patent
law is fundamentally a matter of domestic law; each country has its own patent
laws and its own patent system. Thus, if
a company wants protection in multiple countries, they will have to file patent
applications in each relevant country.
Recently, a number of global events and developments have fostered
an international movement ripe for patent reform and harmonization. For instance, the United States enacted the
America Invents Act (AIA)
in 2011, shifting the
American patent system into a first to file model and bringing the US in line with the rest of the world. Following this dramatic
domestic change, international cooperation has also increased. Numerous additional countries signed the PCT program, an international program
that helps members of participating countries streamline the process for filing
patent applications in multiple countries. Additionally, the U.S. expanded its “workshare”
program, which allows the U.S. patent office to communicate with foreign patent
offices in an effort to share results, reduce redundancy, and increase
efficiency.
Recent crises, such as the Ebola outbreak in West Africa,
have also fostered cooperation and a drive to harmonize complex patent laws. The recent Ebola
outbreak has triggered massive international efforts to bring together patent
owners from different countries in an attempt to pool resources and offer
potentially life-saving drugs at affordable prices. In response, the international community
created “patent
pools”, and, although they do not exemplify traditional patent “law,” they represent the current political
trend toward centralized patent authority.
Consequently, at last month's meeting of global IP leaders,
the precedent for international patent law collaboration was already in
place. The world leaders used the
meeting a chance to publically announce the future direction of the unification
trend. At the meeting, the world leaders
announced that they will be focusing their efforts on increasing communication
between their nations’ patent offices.
This will be a huge step toward harmonization, as it would
simultaneously increase efficiency (by allowing patent agents in different
countries who have worked on the same patent application to talk with each
other and share results) and decrease costs by reducing redundant
research. These steps toward greater
unification of patent laws also tremendously benefit industry.
In today’s global economy, it’s exceedingly rare that a company would
want to launch a product in only one country.
Thus, by enhancing communication between patent offices and decreasing
the differences in their laws, the costs of obtaining patent protection will be
substantially reduced. This will lead to
more products being offered in more countries and at lower prices, as there will no longer be a fear of
lack of protection. The impact this increased availability of products
will have on international trade has yet to be seen, though it will no doubt be
profound.
Photo depicts Opening
Session of WIPO Assembly | Wiki
Commons
0 comments:
Post a Comment